Armoor Pharmaceatical Ltd., And Another, v. Expert Detectives And Secrity Services, And Another,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C aggrieved against the orders dated 31.08.2009 passed in C.C. No.182 of 2009, on the file of the Court of the XV Additional Judge-cum-XlX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.

Between:

Armoor Pharmaceutical Ltd., rep. by its Managing Director, Registered office at Plot No.42, Anrich lndustrial Estate, Bollaram, Medak district. T. Ravindranath Tagore, aged 42 years, Occ: Managing Director, Armour Pharmaceutical Ltd., & Partner of Trak Biotechnologies, R/o Plot No. 33, H.No.8-3-1 67 lDl33, Kalyan Nagar, Hyderabad. 2.

...PETITION ERS/ ACCUSED AND

1. Expert Detectives & Security Services, rep. by its Chief Executive / Proprietor, Sri K. Narasimha Reddy, Registered Office at 4-32-132, Shapur Nagar, l.D.A. Jeedimetla, R. R. District.

2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., at Hyderabad ...COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENTS CRLRCMP. NO:2231 OF 2009 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to the orders oi tne XV Addl. Judge -cum- XtX Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Hyderabad, passed in CC.No. 182 of 2009, dt. 31-8-2009, pending disposal of the above Crl.R.C. Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : M/s. HARIJA AKKINENI Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Sri MUTHYALA MURALIDHAR (ADDITTONAL PUBLTC PROSECUTOR) The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.16O8 of 2OO9 ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, aggrieved by the Orders dated 31.08.2009 passed in C.C.No.182 of 2OO9 by the learned XV Additional Judge-cumXIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.

02. When the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner, on record, submitted that this matter has become infructuous.

03. In view of the above submission, this Criminal Revision Case is liable to be dismissed as infructuous.

04. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There is no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/.I. NAGA LAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR \ \ //TRUE COPY/ SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The XV Additional Judge-cum-XlX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.

2. One CC to Sri l. GOPAL REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to M/s. HARTJA AKK|NEN!, Advocate tOpUCl 4' Two CCs to the.Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT)

5. Two CD Copies

f!

ll HIGH COURT DATED i1610212023 r{E ST4 ( ,>.(.

ORDER

0 3 [Pn 2[?3 CRLRC.No.1608 of 2009 t t - DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL_REVISION_CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS.

ffi6