High Court for State of TelanganaWP/19362/2015disposed of no costs

Asadi Subbamma v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep.By Its Principal Secretary,

2015-06-30Vilas V.Afzulpurkar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETY DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.19362 of 2015 BETWEEN Asadi Subbamma.

... PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Revenue (Stamps & Registration) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. GANDURI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following:

ORDER:

The grievance of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the fourth respondent is insisting upon No Objection Certificate for registration of land

admeasuring Ac.0.95 cents in survey No.254 of Chukkaluru Village, Tadipatri Mandal, Anantapuram District.

2. The issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in W.P.No.17809 of 2015 and batch dated 22.06.2015. In view of the same, following the aforesaid judgment, this writ petition is also disposed of directing the registering authority concerned to receive and process the document presented by the petitioner without insisting upon the no objection certificate to be obtained by her. The registering authority concerned is further directed to receive and process the documents in accordance with the Registration Act, 1908 and Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and if the documents are in conformity with the provisions of the aforesaid enactments, thereafter, register and release the documents in accordance with the due procedure. It is also made clear that in the event of registering authority not being satisfied with the compliance under the Registration Act or the Stamp Act, appropriate refusal endorsement together with reasons shall be recorded and communicated to the petitioner in terms of Section 71 of the Registration Act.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J June 29, 2015/LMV