Kalari Satyanarayana Rao, v. The District Collector

HON'BLE SRI S.V.BHATT W.P.No.3153 of 2011 ORDER:

The petitioner assails the notification issued by the respondents under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the purpose of providing house sites to the beneficiaries under Indiramma Programme. As against the impugned notification, the petitioners submitted their objections. Subsequently, the petitioners were served Section 5-A notice calling for their objections. The objections filed by the petitioner in the enquiry under Section 5-A have been rejected. Thereafter, the declaration under Section 6 dated 18.08.2010 was published. The petitioner assailed the rejection of objections as well as the draft declaration dated 18.08.2010.

This Court, through order dated 11.02.2011, granted interim stay of dispossession of petitioner. The same is subsisting. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondents have issued notice in Form 9.6 either calling for objections or willingness of petitioners to handover the subject matter of the writ petition to Capital Region Development Authority (CRDA). From the issuance of notice, it is stated, the acquisition proceedings taken upon through draft declaration dated 18.08.2010 are given a go-bye by the respondents. The petitioners intend to pursue the options pursuant to the notice issued as part of land pooling. The statement of learned counsel is placed on record.

Having regard to the subsequent development, the writ petition is closed, as no order is necessary. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

__________

26.02.2015 26th February, 2015 Lrkm