← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/181/2015dismissed as infructuous

A. Vivekananda Reddy, Nalgonda Dist v. Chairman And Md, Tsspdcl., Hyderabad And 6 Others

2023-11-14Nagesh Bheemapaka4 pages

[ 3300 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 181 OF 2015 Between:

A. Vivekananda Reddy, S/o: A.Krishna Reddy, Aged about Rt/o H.No.3-1-1 15/5, Santoshnagar, Bhongir Town, Nalgonda State.

43 years, Telangana ...PETITIONER AND

1. Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Co.Ltd., Re.by its Chairman ard Managing Director, Corporate Office, t\i{int Compound, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

2. The Superintending Engineer, Operation, Nalgonda District at Nalgonda.

3. The Divisional Engineer, Operation, Nalgonda, Nalgonda Dist.

4. MD. Anwar Pasha, ADFJDPEiSD-ll, Nalgonda Distric{ Nalgonda.

5. The Divisional Engineer Operation, Bhongir Town, Bhongir, Nalgonda Distrid

6. The Assistant Accounts Officer, ERO, Bhongir, Nalghonda District.

7. The Assistant Engineer, Operation, Bhongir town , Nalgonda District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in t nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Responder No. 6 herein, the Assistant Accounts Officer, ERO (Bhongir) in demanding further balance amount of assessment value from the petitioner by including in the regular monthly bill of January, 2015 as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and pending finalization of the representation dated 10-1 1 -2014 submitted to the DE/Assessments Corporate Office, Mint Compound, Hyderabad.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 201s(WPMP. NO: 194 OF 2015) Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to insist for further payment of Balance amount of assessment of Rs. 2,75,7461-or to resort to disconnection of the Siervice connection I I I I No.46301 14422, Pending disposal of the main Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M. NARSIMLOO Counsel for the Respondents: ----- I The Court made the following: ORDER I j I l

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAIIA trIRIT PETITION NO. 187 of 2015 ORDER:

Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive.

Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition, shall stand closed.

SD/-K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGIS'RAR r_// SECTION OFFICER To, //TRUE COPYII . One CC to Sri M. Narsimloo, Advocate tOpUCl . Two CD Copies TJ SB

HIGH COURT DATED:1411112023 ,.;l' 1 6 STAI€:

t\ v o J)

ORDER

I E 0Et 202] .?\+ * ,/ \ WP.No.181 of 2015 t Dss ptJc DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

() il