Meedikeri Venkataiah v. The State Of Telangana And 2 Others
[ 3301 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK WRIT PETITION NO:4506 OF 2022 Between:
Meedikeri Venkataiah, S/o. Bugappa, aged about.43 Yrs., Occ. Un employee, Rl/o H. No. 260, Sangam Khurd Village of Yalal Mandal, Vikarabad District. PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, rep., by the Commissioner, Telangana State Vaidya Vidhana Parishad ( TSWP ), Badi Chowdi, Kachiguda, Hyderabad. The Superintendent, District Hospital, The Telangana State Vaidya Vidhana Parishad, Tandur Proper and Mandal, Dist. Vikarabad. Sudhakar, S/o: Chandraiah, aged about. 32 Yrs., Rl/o Chegunta Village of Jagdevpur Mandal, Medak Dist., Presently working as Dark Room Attendant at District Hospital, Tandur Proper and Mandal, Vikarabad Dist ....
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or writ particularly writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.2 in not permitting the petitioner to discharge duties as Dark Room Attendor in the District Hospital at Tandur, in pursuance of the letters dt.1211-2021 and 17-12-2021 and Appointment of the Respondent No.3 in the place of the petitioner as Dark Room Attendant in the District Hospital Tandur by thee than Respondent No.2, as arbitrary; illegal and against the principles of natural iustice and law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order Staying the appointment of the respondent no.3 in the post of the Dark Room Attendant of District Hospital at Tandur and directing the respondent no.2 to allow the petitioner to perform his duties as Dark Room Attendant in District Hospital, Tandur with equal pay and other benefits to the similar situated employees, till the finalization of the Writ Petition to meet the ends of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BAJRANG SINGH THAKUR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: M P K ADIWA (SC TWPI Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI M.A.K. MUKHEED, SC The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA I{AR'IHIK WRIT PEf,ITION No.45O6 oF 20.22 ORDER:
Sri B4jrang Singh Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition.
2.
Permission is accorded.
3.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Thcre shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed SD/. L.VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /TTRUE COPY'/ SE TION OFFICER 'To,
1. One C
2. One C
3. One C
4. Two C C to Sri Bajrang Singh Thakur, Advocate [OPUC] C to Sri M. P. K Aditya (SC TWP) IOPUCI C to Sri M.A.K. Mukheed, SC [OPUC] D Copies TJ PSK o
I HIGH COURT DATED:2010112025 ..-aa -a :>- ; ^- !.- { ) ,) 21 i,,i 2t[5 >?a .5 . ,).
\:*.
L-] ...-.
ORDER
WP.No.4506 ot 2022 i DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS 1d @