B Subramanyam v. State Of Telangana

[ 32ee ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENW SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 2442 OF 2018 Between:

1. B.SUBRAMANYAM, Sio B.C.Eshwaraiah(Late), Aged 57 yrs, Occ. ACTO, O/o Dy.Commissione(CT) Office, Secunderabad Division, Mayur Khushal Complex, Gunfoundry, Hyderabad.

2. K.Lakshmana Rao, S/o K.Chall Rao(Late), Aged 57 yrs, Occ. ACTO, O/o Commercial Tax Officer, Lad Bazar Clrcle Gagan Vihar, Nampally, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue(ST) Depatment, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner Of State Tax, State of Telangana, M.J.Market Road, Nampally, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the Nature of Mandamus to declare the entire action of the respondents, particularly the entire action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the case of the petitioners for promotion to the post of DCTO in zone-Vl, inspite of availability of number of vacancies and inspite of repeated representations, even though the petitioners herein are on the verge of retirement is as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper, clear violative of natural justice including contrary Rule 6 of State and subordinate Service Rules and consequently to direct the respondents to forthwith consider the cases of the petitioners for promotion to the post of DCTO in zone -VI in the existing vacancies by duly considering their representations dated 22.O5.2017 made to the 2nd respondent.

lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners for promotion to the post of DCTO in Zone-Vl in the existing vacancies, as they are retiring from service shortly.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SANTHAPUR SAWANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.2442 of 2OL8 ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and requests for dismissal.

2.

In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

3.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall also stand dismissed.

I I SD/.K.AMMAJI ASSISTAryI REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I Ltr.

SECItbN OFFICER I I To

1. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Tetangana, at Hyderabad. [OUTI

2. One CC to SRI SANTHAPUR SATYANARAYANA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 3, Two CD Copies PSK, SW BSR.

HIGH COURT DATED:2710112023 (, 1 HE STA rA:

ORDER

0 3 fii ll 2li1 () WP.No.2442 of 2018 r) DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

e l* t ?l Ol oe(