R.Ravisankar v. Smt. Shaik Badarbee And The State Of A.P.
[32s1 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY. THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL APPEAL N O: 85 oF 2010 Criminal Appeal under Section 378(4) of Crl.P.C against the Judgment dated 18112t2OOg in CC No.1 50 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the XV Additional Judge -cum- XIX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. Between:
R.Ravisankar, S/o R.Ramakoteswara Rao, Fyo H.No.6-'159, Plot No.26, Surya Homes, Sudharshana Reddy Nagar. Chlnthal, Hyderabad. ..APPELLANT/ COMPLAINANT AND
1. Smt. Shaik Badarbee, W/o V.Rohini Kumar, Secondary Grade Asst. M.P.U.P.School. Thotacherla Villaqe, Niandigama Mandal, Krishna District.
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh,, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS/ ACCUSED For the Appellant : SRI D.SESHASAYANA REDDY, Advocate For the Respondent No.1 : NONE APPEARED For the Respondent No.2 : NONE APPEARED The Court delivered the following : JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL APPEAL No.852 OF 2010 ORDER:
Assailing the judgment dated 18.12.2009 in C.C.No. 150 of 2OO8 passed by the learned XV Additional Judge-cum-XlX Addilional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, the t appellant, who is complainant in the said case, filed the present Criminal Appeal.
2. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant/complainant on 08.02.2O19, 19.O3.2021, 10.06.2027 amd 12.10.2022. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant in spite of the matter being listed under the caption 'For Dismissal'.
3.
The case is under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, which is a quasi-criminal in nature. lt is for the appellant/complainant to prosecute his case diligently. The appeal is of the year,2OlO. Since the appellant/ complainant failed to prosecute his case for the last twelve years, this Court find no reason to keep the appeal pending.
Criminal Appeal is dismissed for non4.
Accordingly, the prosecution.
\\ KS, J '2 Crl.A.No,852 of 2010 5.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this petition, shall stand closed.
Sd/-K.SRINIVASA #O JorNr REGIFAR ,TRUE COPY'
To SECTION OFFICER \ l.TheXVAdditionalJudge_cum-XlXAdditionalChief[4etropolitanMagistrate, Hvderabad. (with record s) 2 i;;-Ca; i; ihe Prbl,c Prosecutor, High Court for the Slate of Telangana at Hvderabad (OUT) 3- O'ne CC to Sri D.Seshasayana Reddy, Advocate IOPUC]
4. Two CD CoPies "tA,--
HIGH COURT OATEO:1311012022 L /-.,-F---\ /. l itr-;u;
a /'n ll6 lJ a v ".,s i >s s \ ,'/ )1.
JUDGM ENT CRLA.No.852 of 2010 DISMISSING THE CRL.A. FOR NON-PROSECUTION.
^V\,,