Mohd. Anwar v. State Of Telangana

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CRL.R.C.M.P.No.4295 of 2017 in/and CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.491 of 2015 COMMON ORDER :

Crl.R.C.M.P.No.4295 of 2017 is filed under Section 320 of Cr.P.C. seeking leave of this Court to compound the offence punishable under Section 409 IPC as the matter was settled due to intervention of elders and entered into compromise. 2.

Both parties appeared in person before the Court and they are identified by their respective counsel and filed Photostat copies of Aadhar Cards in proof of their identity. The terms of compromise read over through advocate in Hindi and they admitted to be true and correct. Hence, I find that the compromise is voluntary and apart from that it is a compoundable offence.

Therefore, Crl.R.C.M.P.No.4295 of 2017 is allowed.

Crl.R.C.No.491 of 2015:

3.

In view of the order passed in Crl.R.C.M.P.No.4295 of 2017, this revision is allowed in terms of memorandum of compromise, setting aside the order, dated 27.10.2014, passed in C.C.No.476 of 2013 by the trial Court and confirmed by the appellate Court vide judgment, dated 26.03.2015, in Crl.A.No.1091 of 2014. 4.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. _________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J 13th October 2017 mar