Thurpinti Ruthamma v. B. Vijay Kumar

#FA!--- I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO;469 OF 20rg Conteinpt Case filed Under Sections 10 b 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents herein for willfully and deliberatelyfuiolating the Orders of the High Court dated 05{9-2018 passed in W.P.No.3't728 ot 2018. Between:

Thurpinti Ruthamma, D/o. Late T.Narsaiah, Aged about 56 years, Occ: Housewife, F/o Mulugu, Mulugu Mandal, Medak District. Presenfly Rio H.No.'t-9-1 1 1311 1, Dayanand Nagar, Vidyanagar, Hyderabad

...Petitioner

AND

1. B. Vijay Kumar, Tahsildar Mulugu Mandal SirJdipet, Medak Distric{ ....Respondent

2. Naresh, Village Revenue Officer, O/o. Tahsildar Mulugu Mandal Siddipet, Medak District ...Proposed RespondenURespondent Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. C.M.R. VELU Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

t'

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO CONTEMPT CASE No. 469 of2Ol9 ORDER:

. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri C M R Velu, leamed counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the respondents implemented the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.3l728 of 2018, dated 05.09.2018. 2.

Recording the above submission, no further adjudication is required.

3.

Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd,. T. SRINI DEPUTY REGI ,,TRUE COPY/'

SECTION OFFICER To,

1. B. Mjay Kumar, Tahsildar, Mulugu Mandat, Siddipet, Medak District

2. Naresh, Mllage Revenue fficer, O/o. Tahsildar, Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet, Medak Distric-t

3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUfl

4. One CC to Sri. C.M.R. Velu, Advocate IOPUC]

5. Two CD Copies PSR , I\ (-/'

I I HIGH COURT DATED:1210112024 1HE Si qlc'

c ( -a'+ Z 2 ptAB 2024 Za

ORDER

* t 9ss PAT (lY^g0 CC.No.469 of 2019 CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE.

\5\.ilrY