Pillutla Ravi Shankar v. Smt. P. Vasantha

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY EAMILY cOURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 147 OF 2011 Appeal under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, '1984 against the Order and Decree in F.C.O.P. No.61 of 2009 dated. 11-04-2011 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Additional Family Court, at Hyderabad.

Between:

Pillutla Ravi Shankar, S/o. Pillutla Narasimha Murty, Hindu, Aged about 55 years,Occ. Private Job, R/o. 86 B. S.R. Nagar, Hyderabad - 500 038. ...AppellanUPetitioner AND Smt P. Vasantha, Wo. P. Ravi Shankar, Hindu, Aged about 50 years, Occ. Lecturer, R/o. Plot No. 12, Venkateswara Colony, Narayanaguda, Hyderabad. ... Res p o ndenURes po n de nt lA NO: 'f OF 2021 Application under order 23 Rule 3 Code of Civil Procedure praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow FCA No. 147 of 2011 by granting decree of divorce by way of recording the present joint compromise memo and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Appellant SRI P. RAVI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent: SRI P. S. SAIBABU The Court made the following: JUDGEMENT

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY F.C.A. No.l47 OF 201 I JUDGMENT! @er the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Hima Kohli) 1 .

An application has been moved by leamed counsel for the appellant-husband stating inter alia that the present appeai may be allowed by granting a decree of divorce in favour of the parties in view of a compromise arrived at between them. 2.

We decline to entertain any such request. Il the parties have arrived at a compromise in terms of the Memorandum of Joint compromise enclosed with the present application dated 02.12.2020, it is for them to approach the learned Family Court by moving an application for seeking divorce by mutual consent and following the procedure prescribed in accordance with law.

3.

The present appeal is disposed of along with the pending applications, in view of the settlement arrived at between the par-ties, while leaving them to approach the Family Court with an appropriate application in this regard.

SD/. B.S. CHIRANJEEVI JorNr H2gTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Judge, Additional Family Court, at Hyderabad.(With Records).

2. One CC to Sri P. Ravi Kiran, Advocate IOPUCI

3. One CC to Sri P. S. Saibabu, Advocate IOPUCI

4. Two CD Copies MMK 4"

HIGH COURT H KJ & BVRJ DATED:2710112021 *:I?P ;.,1 $ i.{ 3 0 $rrB 2021 i -fl ?

*:

'i < JUDGEMENT FCA.No.147 of 2011 DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL p /, I