Smt. Baditha Ravanamma, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Principal Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.15557 of 2015 BETWEEN Baditha Ravanamma ... PETITIONER AND State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary and others ...RESPONDENTS The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Heard.

2. Petitioner has already given a notice under Section 80 CPC to the official respondents, vide Ex.P1, dated 25.04.2015. Present writ petition is filed to treat the said notice as representation and issue Mandamus as prayed for.

3. The allegations in the affidavit involve disputed questions of fact and the petitioner has rightly invoked Section 80 CPC and notified the official respondents of proposed action. Hence, the said statutory notice cannot be treated as a representation for the purpose of entertaining the writ petition.

4. Writ petition is, therefore, declined to be entertained and is, accordingly, dismissed. Petitioner, however, is at liberty to pursue the remedies in pursuance of the notice already given by him under Section 80 CPC.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J June 4, 2015 Lmv