G.Swamy Reddy, Karimnagar District. v. Prlsecy, Panchayat Raj And Rural Devl, Hyd And Another
[ 3302 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 25275 OF 2011 Between:
G.Swamy Reddy, S/o Malla Reddy, R/o H.No.19-60, S.W. Colony, Huzurabad of Karimnagar District.
...PETITIONER AND 1- The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Superintending Engineer, Panchayat Raj Circle, Karimnagar. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issued a writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action on the legal notice dated- 20.O8.2011 submitted by the petitioner as highly illegal arbitrary and contrary to the Judgement of this Hon'ble Court and consequently direct the respondents to cancel the tender notice No.1211912011-12 dt.16.O7.2011 and recall the tender duly deleting condition of experience in terms of G.O.Ms.No.94 l&CAD Dt. 01.07.2003 and G.O.Ms.No.'124 I&CAD dt-20.12.2004.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2011(WPMP. NO:31085 oF 20111 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all proceeding in pursuant to the opening of tenders including concluding of Agreement with the alleged L.1 , pending disposal of the above writ petition' Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.MALLAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON,BLE SRI JUSTICE K'SARATH WRIT PETITION No.25275 f 20lr o oRDER:
LearnedCounselappearingforthepetitioner submits that the petitioner seeking cancellation of the tender notice No'12/ lgl2}l 1-12 dated 16'07'2011 and recall the same. As on today' there is no interim order passed by this Court in this matter'
2. In view of the same' cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and no further orders are required to be passed in this matter, thereby' the Writ Petition has become infructuous Recording the above said submission' the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions' if any pending, shall stand dismissed'
No order as to costs.
s D/- Ks,EErift +HtSlSiIXI .,\ //TRUE COPY/'
SECTION OFFICER 'O'.,. ON" CC tO SRI P.MALLAIAH' AdVOCAtE IOPUC1 , Iuif"??:i"ff"[CIft::"t]Jil,T, & R,RAL DEV' Hish court ror the
3. Two CD CoPies N+* BSR '- ,: lF. -
# HIGH COURT DATED: 1611212023 1 E STAref
ORDER
o .I5i * [ 4 'l[N ?[2[ oo WP.No.25275 ot 2011 t D55c1.r (il tt€ DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS \r- 13 i I l