Ms. Harender Kaur v. State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep. By Its Principal Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT APPEAL No. 259 of 2016 Date: 27.04.2016 Between:

Ms. Harender Kaur ... Appellant And State of A.P., rep., by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Hyderabad & another.

... Respondents

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO WRIT APPEAL No. 259 of 2016 PC: (per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale) This appeal is directed against the order, dated 29.12.2015, in W.P.M.P.No.28245 of 2015 in W.P.No.21937 of 2015.

In W.P.M.P., the appellant, pending disposal of the writ petition, prayed for suspension of non-bailable warrant issued against her in C.C.No.592 of 2012, pending before III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, Krishna District. In the writ petition, the appellant has prayed for quashing of the charge in C.C.No.592 of 2012.

We have perused the order, dated 29.12.2015, impugned in the appeal. It is well reasoned order. Keeping that in view, on last occasion, we asked Sri Vedula Venkataramana, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant, whether the appellant is prepared to appear before this Court or before the Court, which has issued non-bailable warrant, and seek either cancellation of non-bailable warrant or bail in C.C.No.592 of 2012, and if she agrees for the same, we may protect her till she appears before the Court. On this, learned Senior Counsel sought time to take instructions. Today, he submits that under any circumstances, the appellant is not prepared to come to India and submit herself to the process of

law either before this Court or any other Court, since she apprehends that if she comes to India she will be arrested and not get bail. This being so, we do not understand why she is seeking suspension of the non-bailable warrant. The person, who is not having regard and respect for the Courts in this country and who is not prepared to submit to the process of law, in our opinion, does not deserve any indulgence.

Under these circumstances and for the reasons stated in the impugned order, we have no option but to dismiss the appeal. Order accordingly.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.

_______________________ DILIP B.BHOSALE, ACJ ____________________​__ P.

NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 27.04.2016 ES