← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCC/216/2018dismissed

D.Rama Krishna v. Mala Kandaiah

2018-09-14C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy,Gudiseva Shyam Prasad4 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GUDISEVA SHYAM PRASAD Between:

D.Rama Krishna S/o.Subba Rao, Aged about 41 years, Occ: Unemployed, R/o.Repalle, Guntur district, Andhra Pradesh.

...

Petitioner And Mala Kondaiah, Vice Chairman and Managing Director, A.P. State Road Transport Corporation, Pandit Nehru Bus Station, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh and two others.

...

Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. B.S.Nishanth Moses for Mr.M.Pitchaiah Counsel for the Respondents:

Mr.P.Durga Prasad Standing Counsel for APSRTC The Court made the following:

Order: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy) This contempt case is filed alleging willful disobedience of order dated 22.08.2017 in W.A.No.1060 of 2017. 2.

On 13.07.2018, after respondent No.2 filed a counter affidavit, the learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.Pitchaiah, submitted that though the aspect relating to Section 2 (i) of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, has been referred to and decided, the claim of the petitioner based on settlement, has not been considered by order dated 07.03.2018 of respondent No.2, passed in pursuance of judgment dated 22.08.2017 in W.A.No.1060 of 2017. Mr.P.Durga Prasad, learned Standing Counsel, requested for adjournment for passing a fresh order with respect to the said aspect. Accordingly, the learned Standing Counsel filed a Memo. dated 06.09.2018, enclosing a copy of proceedings bearing No.L1/876(26)/2015-RM(G) dated 24.08.2018 passed by respondent No.2, wherein he has considered the claim of the petitioner based on the settlement. 3.

In the light of the aforementioned order, respondent No.2 has duly complied with the direction contained in judgment dated 22.08.2017 in W.A.No.1060 of 2017.

4.

Therefore, the contempt case is dismissed, however, leaving the petitioner free to avail a fresh legal remedy if he feels aggrieved

by the aforementioned order dated 24.08.2018 passed by respondent No.2.

______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) _____________________ (Gudiseva Shyam Prasad,J) Date: 14th September, 2018 msb