High Court for State of TelanganaWP/37768/2015disposed of no costs

Ch. Apparao S/O Late Madhava Rao v. The State Of Telangana Rep. By Its

2015-11-20Vilas V.Afzulpurkar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * WRIT PETITION No. 37768 of 2015 BETWEEN Ch.Apparao ... PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary and others ...RESPONDENTS Date of Order pronounced: 20.11.2015 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgments?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether his Lordship wish to see the Yes/No fair copy of the Judgment?

ORDER:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue.

2. Petitioner states that the request for correction of entries in the revenue records is pending with the fourth respondent with regard to the lands claimed by the petitioner in this writ petition as shown in the prayer. Petitioner states that on his request and the request of the fifth respondent, a Joint Survey was conducted on 24.08.2015, but thereafter no further follow up action is taken by the fourth respondent. Petitioner is stated to have made various representations to the Collector as well as to the Revenue Divisional Officer. Complaining of inaction, the present writ petition is filed.

3. The correction of entries in the revenue record is, primarily, for the recording authority viz., the fourth respondent. Hence, petitioner is at liberty to make appropriate application before the fourth respondent.

4. Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. As and when such an application is received, the fourth respondent shall give notice to all the parties affected, hear them, and take appropriate decision in the matter preferably within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the application.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J

November 20, 2015 LMV