B.Mohan Reddy, v. Peddapalli Nagar Panchayat,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 33021 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TE{-ANGANA AT HYDERAAAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRITPETITION NO: 41221 OF 2014 Between:
B.Mohan Reddy, S/o. Veera Reddy Aged about 61 years, Occ Retd. Employee, Ri./o. H.No.1-2-341318, Pragalhi Nagar, PeddapaHi, Karimnagar, District, Telangana.
...PETITIONER AND '1 . Peddapalli Nagar Panchayat, Peddapalli, Karimnagar Districl. Rep. by its Commissioner.
2. N.Lakshmi Varaprasad Rao, S/o. Venkata Narsimha Rao, Aged about 45 years, FUo.H.No.1-2-34131C, Pragathi Nagar, near Missbn H(;h School Road, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District.
RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutaon of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction the action of the 1st respondent in not taking any action for demolition of the unauthorized conslruction made by 2nd respondent in the premises bearing H.No.'l-2-34l3/C, Pragathi Nagar, Peddapalli, Karimnagar District as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 1st respondent to take action against the u nauthorized constructions l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP.
NO: 51604 OF 20 141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the '1st respondent to take action for riemolitron of the constructions made by the 2nd respondent in premises beartng H.No.1-2- 34/3/C, Pragathi Nagar' Peddapalli, Karimnagar District contrary to the approved plan, pending disposal of the WP Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. O. MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI N. PRAVEEN KUMAR (SC FOR MC,TELANGANA) Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI A.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH W.P.No.4122L of 2QL4 ORDER:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to approach the appropriate authorities.
2.
Granting liberty as prayed for, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 3.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending in this petition, shall stald dismissed.
SD/-8. SARASWATHI ASSISTANT RE ISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION FFICER To, 'l . One CC to SRl. O. MANOHER REDDY, Advocate [OP-UC] - - .
i O;; CC iO SNI. N. PRAVEEN KUMAR,(SC FOR MC,TELANGANA) a one cc io Snt. A. suRYANARAYANA, Advocate [oPUC]
4. Two CD CoPies BM GJP loPUCl ,hb
HIGH COURT DATED:2911212023 e sTArC $ ( v 7 IAN 202[ i q Jo oi -t l DEsptdt'
ORDER
WP.No.41221 of 2014 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS a.\ ,+