← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/3335/2020withdrawn

Battini Satish Goud v. The State Of Telangana And 2 Others

2020-12-31Shameem Akther3 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETITI ON NO 3335 0F 2020 Between:

Battini Satish Goud, Si o R/o. H.No. 5-98/2, Sai Nagaram, R.R District.

B. Sailu Goud, Chandra ColonY, Aoe 49 Years, Occ Business.

Dimmaiguda, Keesara Mandal.

...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary' Stamps and Registration Department. Secre'iariat. Hyderabad'

The Sub-Register, Keesara, Ranga Reddy District' Telangana' Biiiala Eashwar, S/o Srisilam. Occ 48 years Occ.Business' 'Rii:'ilsiil;;iii#r",r, Viiirgu, nilup"iu Mandal' Nalgonda District' relansana J ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in tne-attio Jvii tited therewith, the Hiqh court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or air""tioi"roi"'particutarty one in the-nature of writ of Mandamus DirectingtheRespondentr.ro'ztostopallfurthertransactionSofthePropertyPlotNo. 21t8, in survey No. S6+' AJmeasuring '1 50 Square yards' .situated at Damaiguda'

flrglrm Village, Keesara Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' Telangana' IA NO: 1 0F 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support "r'ir,"

p"titio",ir,e uign corrt may be preased to Direct the Respondent No.2 to ,rry on-uTf-irtrher translction in regards to Property Plot No' 2118, in survey No. So+' nJmeasuring 150 Sgyare. yards' Situated at D-amaiguda' Nagaram Village, Keesai,- fr'f'"olf "R'ng' iteooy District' Telangana pending disposal of the writ Petitron'

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RACHAKONDA RAMAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos' 1&2: GP FOR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION Counsel for the Respondent No'3: SRI D' VIJAYA KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER WRIT PETITION No.3335 of 2020

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a Ietter, dated 29.12.2020, before the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition, stating that the parties have mutually settled the matter outside the Court. 2.

Perm ission is accorded.

3.

Accordingly, this writ petition ls dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, iF any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISJRAR \ t_,,.

SECTION OFFICER tirnue coPYll \ To, '1. One CC to Sri. Rachakonda Ramakrishna, Advocate IOPUC]

2. One C.C. to Sri. D Vijaya Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CCs to GP for Stamps and Registration, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

4. Two C.D. CoPies Prk c'$./

HIGH COURT DATED:3111212020 $,t"

.t s k e oo r0fi JAt!2021 a

ORDER

* * ct WP. No. 3335 of 2020 ,t Dismissing the WP.

as withdrawn without costs.

\ G-