R.Vasanth Rao,R.R Dist, v. The Depot Manager,Apsrtc, Hyd And Another,

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY rWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION NO:11886 0F 2007 Betwee n:

R.Vasanth Rao, S/o.Late Ramakrishna Village, Shameerpet, R.R. District.

Rao, R/o.H.No.18-86-16, Rajendranagar ...PETITIONER AND 1 The Depot lVlanager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Falaknuma Depot, Engine Bowli, Hyderabad.

2. The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Hyderabad City Region, Picket, Secunderabad.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of [\4andamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the 2nd respondent herein to consider the representation dt.8-3-2007 and sanction annual increments of the years 2005 and 2006 and to release the salaries during the period of March, 2006 to November 2006 in interest of justice. WPMP. NO: 14761 OF 2007 Petition under Section '1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dt.8-3-2007 for granting increments and releasing salaries.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHD. GHOUSEUDDIN Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N. VASUDEVA REDDY (S.C. FOR T.S.R.T.C.) The Court made the following: ORDER

-2 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.11886 OF 2OO7 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for the respondent - Corporation.

2.

This writ petition is filed praying to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 08.03.2007 and sanction annual increments lor the years 2005 and 2006 and release the salaries during the period of March, 2006 to Novembcr, 2OO6.

3. This Court, by order dated 11.06.2OO7, made in W.P.M.P.No.14767 ol 2007, directed the 2na respondent to pass appropriate orders as per law within a period of three weeks lrom the date of receipt o[ copy of the order.

4.

In the counter affidavit, while justifying the decision not to grant the benefit sought by the petitioner, it is averred that on 2O.08.2OO7 , orders were pAssed in compliance of the directions issued by this Court.

5.

Since the prayer in the writ petition was only to consider the representation, dated 08.03.2007 and pass appropriate orders, and orders dated 2O.O8.2OO7 were passed, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous.

6.

The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending Miscellaneous Petitions, il any, shall stand closed.

SD/. K AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER to'',. on" CC to Sri tr4ohd. Ghouseuddin' Ad-vocate]oPucl

2. one cc to sri u. vutJil""l"hl'ilviSt F"i ts'R r'b ) toPUCl

3. Two CD CoPies.

MPJ \ \,^r

HIGH COURT PNR,J DATED:2710212020 TAra, S e i zt A?ff 2020 v IJ .a'

1';f-"'!

* t.:

ORDER

WP.No.11886 of 2007 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS Z x +