Minala Praveen v. The State Of Telangana

,/ HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENry SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1d23I OF 2016 Between:

MINALA PRAVEEN, S/O M. GOPALA NAIDU, COMMERCIAL PORTER OFFICE OF SENIOR DIVISIONAL COMMERCIAL MANAGER, SCR, HYDERABAD DIVISION, RIO H.NO.12-1 1-1352/4, BOUDHA NAGAR WARASIGUDA, SECUNDERABAD ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND

1. THE STATE OF TELANGANA, THROUGH lTs SPL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, CBI, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE HYDERABAD.

2. The Station House Officer, CBl, SPE, Hyd

3. S.Md.RASHEED, TICKET EXAMINER, KACHIGUDA, SCR, RIO H.NO.120617, RAILWAY QUARTERS CHILKALGUDA, SECUNDERABAD ...RESPONDENT/COMPLANANTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in.the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 1 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the lll Addl Special Judge for CBI cases, Hyderabad. l.A NO: 2 OF 2016(CRLPMP. NO: 17234 OF 20'16l Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including apparance of the petitioner in court in CC.No.1l2O15 on the file of the court of the lll Addl. Spe;ial Judge for DBI Cases, Hyderabad

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the proceedings in CC.No. 1 ol 2015 on the file of the court of the lll Addl. Special Judge for CBI cases, Hyderabad including the appearance of the petitioner before court and also pass orders to expedite the hearing of the present quash petition and pass such other further orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to file the above said documenls in the quash petition Crl.P.No. 15231 of 2016.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V. Pattabhi, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Special Public Prosecutor for CBI on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and 2 and Sri Dr.D.V.Rao, Advocate for the Respondent No.3.

The Court made the following: ORDER

I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VTNUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No. 15231 oF 2016 ORDER:

Mr. Rakesh, learned counsel representing Mr' V. Pattabhi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no further orders are required in the Criminal Petition and therefore, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Petition. 2.

Permission as sought for is accorded.

3.

Recording the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn' Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed Sd/. B. SARASW ASSISTANT REGIS R //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The lll Addl Special Judge for CBI cases, Hyderabad

2. The Station House Officer, CBl, ACB, Hyderabad

3. One CC to Sri V Pattabhi, Advocate [OPUC]

4. One CC to SRI D.V.Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CCs to the Special Public Prosecutor for CBl, High Court for the State of Telangana [OUTI

6. Two CD Copies

HIGH COURT DATED:2210912023 vtE $rArt a \ e 06il0{2m ,

ORDER

\.+:.::

- *.y'

CRLP.No.1523'l of 2016 Dismissing the Criminal Petition as withdrawn Io