Gundla Donakanti Ganga Ram, v. District Collector,

[ 3303 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) SATURDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 26683 OF 2009 Between:

'I . Gundla Donakanti Ganga Ram, S/o. N/uttenna, aged about 50 years, Occ: Labour,

2. Gundla Yerra Pedda Sayanna, S/o. Devanna, aged 49 years, occ: Labour, Both are Ri,/o. Thimmapur Village, Morthadu Mandal, Nizambad District. ...PETITIONERS AND '1 . District Collector, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District.

2. Tahsildar, Morthadu Mandal, Nizamabad District ...RES'ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the.affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the claim of the petitioners for the assignment of land to an extent of Ac. 5-00 guntas in Sy.No. 1858 situated of Thimmapur Village, Morthadu Mandal, as per the directions of this Hon'ble Court in earlier Writ Petitioners, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondents to assign the said land in favour of the petitioners forthwith. l.A. NO: I OF 2009(WPMP.

NO: 34763 OF 2009) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for assignment of the said land to an extent of Ac. 5-00 guntas in Sy.No. 1858 situated of Thimmapur Village, Nizambad Mandal, immediately, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI J.KANAKAIAH Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.26683 of 2009 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. 2.

Recording the said submission, the ,,vrit petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if al_v, shall stand closed.

SD/- K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// _i SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI J.KANAKAIAH, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI

3. Two CD Copies BSR GJP

HIGH COURT DATED: 1611212023 E s rA/6 c () I E Jhii ?l?q vi C:

A.

.:) * ^-ia.\ Di:S P

ORDER

WP.No.26683 of 2009 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS ( (^) 2x>:v \