Nallabothu Drowpathi v. Nallabothu Veeramma

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA SECOND APPEAL NO: 918 OF 2004 Appeal under section '100 of C.p.C. against the Judgment and Decree dated 29-03-2004 made in A.s.No. 12 ot 2oo3 on the file of the court of the V Additional District Judge (FTC No.lv), at Khammam., preferred against the Decree in o.s.No. 509 of 1999 dated 21-09-2002 on the file of the court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam District. Between:

Nallabothu Drowpathi, Wo. Late Venkateswarlu, Occ- Household, R:/o. Tirumalayapalam Village and Mandal, Khammam District. ...Appellant AND '1. Nallabothu Veeramma, Wo. Late Rangaiah, Occ- Household, R/o Thirumalayapalam Village and Mandal, Khammam District.

2. Nallabothu Muthaiah, S/o. Late Rangaiah, Occ- Agriculture, R/o. Thirumalayapalam Village and Mandal, Khammam District.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. P. VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRl. V. BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA SECOND APPEAL NO. 918 OF 2OO4 JUDGMENT:

Plaintiff has filed O.S. No.509 of 1999 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam, for Permanent Injunction. The trial Court dismissed the suit. The unsuccessful plaintiff preferred appeal vide A.S.No.12 of 2003 wherein the appellate Court allowed the appeal, against which the second appeal has been filed. 2.

A perusal of the docket proceedings shows that the learned counsel for the appellant did not evince any interest to pursue the second appeal proceedings. On 08.08.2023, as there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today also, there is no representation for the appellant. No purpose would be served in continuing the Second Appeal. 3.

Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, lf any, shall stand closed. sd/- K. sHYL#Ht DEPUW REGTS)RAR u/ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The V Additional District Judge (FTC No.tV), at Khammam

2. The Principal Junior Civil Judge, Khammam District.

9. r/EERA RE pDy -Adyoc.t fOe Uc]

3. One CC to SRI

4. One CC to SRI. V. BRAHMAIAH CHOWDARY, Advocate TOPUCI

5. Two CD Copies g

/I HIGH COURT PSS,J DATED: 1 910912023 ( '1t\E STalIe 0 4 ,l[N ?02[ o .b J *

JUDGMENT

i oEsF/rTc SA.No.918 ot 2O04 ;

l SECOND APPEAL IS DISMISSED .

,t @f,.t^ffi i