← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/3518/2019dismissed no costs

Mohd Pasha v. The State Of Telangana

2019-03-13P Naveen Rao4 pages

Date : 13.3.2019 Between:

Mohd Pasha S/o Mohd Magbool Aged about 40 years Occ Business R/o N T R Nagar Gopanpally Hyderabad Petitioner And The State of Telangana Rep by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat Hyderabad & others Respondents The Court made the following:

ORAL ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Home.

2.

This writ petition is filed alleging that Station House Officers of Gachibowli and Chandanagar police stations are unnecessarily calling the petitioner on daily basis by making telephonic calls, affecting his life and personal liberty and the same is illegal. 3.

On written instructions furnished by Inspector of Police, Gachibowli police station, learned Government Pleader would submit that in 2017 Crime No. 53 of 2017 was registered under Sections 447, 427 read with Section 34 of IPC based on a complaint filed by one Shaik Mohammed Salahuddin alleging criminal trespass. It is also stated that petitioner is involved in another case in Crime No. 434 of 2017 under Sections 447, 427 and 506 of IPC, wherein he has obtained anticipatory bail. Further, based on the written instructions furnished by Sub Inspector of Police, Chandanagar police station, learned Government Pleader would submit that on a complaint filed by one Mohd Pasha, GD entry was made and as crime reported was non cognizable, after obtaining permission from the Court, case was registered against petitioner in Crime No. 111 of 2019 under Section 506 of IPC on 2.3.2019 and that before registration of crime, petitioner was not called to police station.

4.

It is thus clear that three crimes are registered recently in two different police stations and in the process of investigation into the said crimes, police are entitled to call upon the petitioner. Therefore, it cannot be said that police are illegally calling the petitioner, affecting his

right to life and personal liberty, as sought to be contended. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedies against registration of crimes. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, are closed.

__________________ P NAVEEN RAO,J DATE: 13-3-2019 TVK

Date : 13.3.2019