Deeti Ravi v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 40757 OF 2014 ORDER:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

The prayer sought in the Writ Petition is as under: " ....to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd and 3rd respondents in interfering with our possession of the land in an extent of Ac. 3.38 guntas in Sy.No. 247/ 2 Garimella Village, Mancherial Mandal, Adilabad District at the instance of respondents 4 to 35 as highly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and interfering in civil disputes and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere with civil disputes."

3.

The grievance of the petitioners is that respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are interfering with their peaceful possession over their land in an extent of Ac.3.38 guntas in Sy.No.247/ 2 situated at Garmilla village, Mancherial mandal, Adilabad district at the instance of respondent Nos. 4 to 35.

4.

Learned GP placed on record, the written instructions dated 12.11.2018 issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Mancherial P.S. 5.

A perusal of the said written instructions would reveal that two criminal cases have been registered against the petitioners and their associates vide Cr.No.87 of 2015 and Cr.No.88 of 2015 for various offences. In one of the crimes, the investigation is completed and charge sheet is already filed. Learned Magistrate, after taking cognizance of the offence numbered the same as CC.No.401 of 2016. It is specifically stated in the said written instructions that respondent Nos. 3 and 4 have not taken the

petitioners to the police station forcefully on 15.1.2014 and warned them with dire consequences and forced them to sign on the documents. It is also specifically denied that respondent No.3 is interfering in the civil disputes and extracting money from both the parties.

6.

In the light of the said specific statement, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are required in the Writ Petition. 7.

The written instructions are made part of the record. 8.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs.

__________________ P. KESHAVA RAO,J Date: 12.11.2018 KPM