Anaparthi Satynaryana , Sathish v. The State Of Ap.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO Crl.R.C. No.3038 of 2015 ORDER :

The petitioners preferred the present Criminal Revision Case by invoking the provisions under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved by the order dated 25-08-2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.693(A) of 2014 in C.C.No.160 of 2013 on the file of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nidadavole.

2. Heard and perused.

3. After arguing for some time, the learned counsel for petitioners confined his argument and prayed to dispense with the presence of petitioners before the trial Court.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and as the question of identity of the accused does not arise, the presence of petitioners is dispensed with before the trial Court, except on the dates on which the trial Judge insists for their appearance.

5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of.

6. Miscellaneous petitions filed in this revision, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 08th December, 2015

skmr