Smt. Tumu Jyothi v. The State Of Telangana

13251 |

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 217 OF 2020 Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 397 and 401 of CrPC against the order dated 12.11.2019 passed in M.C. No. 71 ot 2018 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court, at L.B. Nagar, Ranga Reddy District Between:

Smt. Tumu Jyothi, W/o. Pithani Suresh, Aged 38 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Plot No. 174, Vanasthali Htlls, Vanasthalipuram, Hayatnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict ...PETITIONERYPETITION ER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by the Public Prosecutor High Court of Telangana Hyderabad

2. Sri Pithani Suresh, Occ. Central Govt. Employee, R/o. 4E, Block No. 339, Konnut High Road, Ayanavaram, Chennai, Tamilnadu ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. MALAVIKA.B REP. FOR SRI. T SURYASATISH Counsel for the Respondent No.l: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2L7 of 2O2O JUDGMENT:

1. Ms.Malavika.B, learnecl counsel representing Sri T.Surya Satish, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 2"a respondent/husband died and that in view of the same, the cause in the Criminal Revision Case does not survive for consideration.

2. Recording the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/. I. NAGA LAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, The Judge, Family Court, L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to Sri T. Surya Satish, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies plp DL $

HIGH COURT DATED:2910312023 - -j* " .--.-....

JUDGMENT

CRLRC.No.217 of 2020 x 1 $,[\ ?t?] -t'

DISMISSING THE CRL.RC AS INFRUCTUOUS ,t 5ro e9 qB