P. Sujatha v. The Joint Collector
[ 3302 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NO: 5580 OF 2022 Between:
1. P. Sujatha, W/o P.VenkataReddy, Aged about 61 yrs, Occ.House wife, R/O. Tondapally Village, Parigi Mandal, Vikarabad District 501501.
2. C.Venkat Reddy, S/o Late C.Ram Reddy, Aged about 55 yrs, Occ. Agriculture, Plot No.41, Saraswathinagar, Bairamalguda, Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONERS AND District.
2.
3.
about 65 yrs, Occ.
R.District.
Mandal, R.
5.
4.
6.
about 60 yrs, Occ.
, R.R.District.
Agriculture. R/o Padkal Village, Mandal ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned orders passed by the Respondent No.1 on 0711212019 in case no. D5/4704I2016(RR) D1110312015 is illegal, arbitrary and unsustainable, against the principles of natural Justice and unconstitutional and against the provisions of ROR Act (old) more particularly Sec.9 and 10 of ROR Act(old) and consequently direct the Respondent No.1 and 2 to cancel the illegal entries made in favour of Respondent No.4 to 6 and restore the name of the Petitioner No.1 and 2 in respect of immovable property for an extent of Ac.12.30 Gts in Sy.No.421, Ac.3.08 Gts in Sy.No.422 , Ac.4.23 Gts in Sy.No.534, Ac.1.3 Gts
in Sy.No.1i47, Ac.1.02 Gts in Sy.No.565, Ac.O.35 Gts and 601 Ac.1.29 Gts situated at Padkal Village, Talakondapally Mandal R.R.District. IANO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 15't CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affida!'it filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the impugned proceedings Dt. 0711212019 in case no. 051470412016(RR) D1110312015 passed by the Respondent No.2 pending disposal of the present Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI J.RAMMOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 TO 6: SRI AKKAM ESHWAR The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.558O of 20.22 ORDER:
This petition is coming for hearing since 2022. On 15.LO.2O25 when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for Dismissal". Bven today, when the matter is called, there is no representation. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute this case.
2. Accordingly, the writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution/default. No order as to costs.
3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, in this Writ Petition shall also stand closed.
SD/- SRI A.H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to SRI J.RAMMOHAN RAO, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI AKKAM ESHWAR, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]
4. Two CD Copies PSK.
BM .t'l ,I J I
HIGH COURT DATED i1211112025
ORDER
c I hE WP.No.5580 of 2022 ('
L () 0 7 i'llr i'r?i * * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION/ DEFAULT WITHOIJT COSTS co?9 %6"\#