Smt A. Basavapunnamma v. The State Of Telangana
\ HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT. }USTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA Criminal Petition No. 1047 of 2019 Between:
Smt A. Basavapunnaruna, W/o late Siva Prasada Rao, Aged 62 years R/o. Plot-l9, Lakshminagar, Lane-1,. Siddartha Nagar North, Near AG Colony, Hydarabad.
...Petitioner/ Accused No.2.
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of . Telangana at Hyderabad.
.Respondent.
2. Adepalli Lakshmi Prasarura,W / o A.Srinagapavary aged about32 years, R/o. Plot.No.19, Lakshminagar North, Sidhartha Nagar, Near A.G. Colony' Hyderabad'
...Respondent/Defcto Complainant.
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the entire records in C.C.No.43 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad and quash the same as abuse of process of law.
I.A. NO:1OF 2019 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.43 of 2018 on the file of
the Court of the XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above criminal petition. ".,This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M.R.L.Narasimha Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri S.U.V. Srinivas, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA No.
of ORDER:
1. The present criminal Petition is fited seeking the court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in c.c.No.43 of 2018 on the file of the court of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad.
2.
No representation on petitioner's side on call' . the other hand, learned Additional Public 3.
On Prosecutor, on written instructions, submits that the Calendar Case in question ended in acquittal and thus, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.
4.
Recording the said submission, the criminal Petition is dismissed.
5.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/ - B. CHANDRA PRAKASH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / /TRUEC0PY / / AD SECTION OFFICER \ To,
1. The XIII Additionat Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Namplly at Hyderabad.
2. The Station House Officer, Women Police Station, CCS, Hyderabad.
3. One CC to Sri M.R.L.Narasimha Rao, Advocate [OPUC] +. One CC to SriS-U.V. Srinivas, Advocate IOPUC] s.r*oCCstothePublicProsecutor,HighCourtfottheStateof Telangana, at HYderabad [OUT] \
6. Two CD CoPies'
\'52- ]CK
, d ,?
HIGH COURT DATED:OZ/03/2023
ORDER
$E ST4 r4.
t CRLP.No.1047 of 2019 o ,,J 11 APn lii23 L-, i ,,.!:
: ,:
:- r'
..i"
+ fii.:.i;,,: '-- "
Dismissing the Criminal Petition as infructuous.
?_q.
tr