G.B. Paparayudu v. The State Of Telangana, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29581 of 2015 05.11.2015 Between:

G.B.Paparayudu .. Petitioner and The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Labour, Employment and Training Department, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Ms.G.B.Deepa, for Mr.Ancha Panduranga Rao Counsel for respondent No.1: Government Pleader for Labour (TS) Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 6:Mr.B.G.Ravinder Reddy, standing counsel for E.S.I.

Counsel for respondent No.3: Government Pleader for Medical Health and Family Welfare Counsel for respondent No.4: Government Pleader for Revenue (TS) Counsel for respondent No.5: Mr.K.Ramakrishna for Mr.G.Narender Reddy, standing counsel for Gram Panchayats

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

The purported inaction of the respondents in considering the petitioner's representation for shifting of the E.S.I. hospital from the existing place to another place is questioned in this writ petition.

A perusal of the record shows that the petitioner has not made representation to respondent No.2, who is stated to be the competent authority for taking a decision on the issue. Therefore, no mandamus can be issued. However, the petitioner is permitted to make a detailed representation to respondent No.2. Within a period of two months of receipt of such representation, respondent No.2 is directed to take a decision thereon and communicate the same

to the petitioner.

Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.Nos.38338 and 46242 of 2015 shall stand disposed of as infructuous.

_________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J 05th November, 2015 GHN