Chintalapudi Tirupathi Reddy v. Kanthamaneni Rajendra Rao

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.SUNIL CHOWDARY SECOND APPEAL No.126 of 2013 JUDGMENT:

This appeal is filed by the plaintiffs, under section 100 CPC, assailing the judgment and decree dated 05.10.2012 in A.S.No.223 of 2008 on the file of VII Additional District Court (FTC), at Vijayawada, wherein whereby the decree and judgment dated 15.09.2008 in O.S.No.564 of 2006 on the file of First Additional Senior Civil Judge Court, Vijayawada, dismissing the suit filed by the plaintiffs for specific performance of agreement of sale, was confirmed.

2.

At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that in spite of his best efforts, he could not contact the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not interested to prosecute the matter. No purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending further.

3.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ T.SUNIL CHOWDARY, J 02.11.2018 Rns