Abdul Munaf, v. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation

[ 3383 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANG

AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION NO: 40026 OF 2014 Between:

Abdul Munaf, S/o Late Abdul Kareem, aged 73 years, Occ ;Business, R/o H.No B-3166121D, Erragadda, Hyderabad. .....PETITIONER AND

1. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner and Special Officer, Tankbund, Hyderabad.

2. The Assistant City Planner, Circle no.10, GHMC, Khairtabad, Hyderabad.

3. Mr. Md. Yakoob, Sio Late Abdul Aziz, aged 48 Years, Occ ; Business, R/o premises bearing no. o B-3-166/2/8, Erragadda, Hyderabad.

4. Smt. Najma Shaheen, Wo IVId. Yakoob, aged about 38 years, Occ. ; Househ6ld, R/o premises bearing no. 8-3-1 66/2/8, Erragadda, Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the in action of the respondents no. 1 and 2 in not taking action against the illegal construction being carried out by the Respondent no. 3 and 4 in the in premises bearing no. 8-3-166/2/8, Erragadda, Hyderabad, as illegal, arbitrary, capricious and in violation of the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondent no. 1 and 2 to remove the illegal construction already carried on by the Respondent no. 3 and 4 and further stop the respondent no.3 and 4 from carrying on construction in the said premises.

|.A.NO:1 OF 2014 (WPMP.NO:50201 OF 2014) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 3 & 4 to stop any further construction in the premises bearing no. 8-3-1661218, Erragadda, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI AADESH VARMA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : SRI G.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : -- The Court macle the following ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION No.4OA26 of 2OL4 ORDER:

This writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent Nos.l and 2 in not taking action against the illegal construction being carried out by respondent Nos.3 and 4 irt the premises bearing No.8-3-L66l2lB, Erragadda, Hyderabad, as illegal and arbitrary and for consequential relief. 2.

Sri Aadesh Varma, Iearned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2, are present.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He also represented that the petitioner has filed a Memo on O6.O4.2015 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.

4.

Permission is accorded.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order at to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition, shall stand closed.

SD/- T. SRID RE //TRUE COPYII OFFICER To 1.

2.

3.

UC] One CC One CC Two CD to SRI AADESH VARIVA, Advocate IOPUC] to SRI G.TMADHUSUDHAN REDDY, Advocate Copies SA BSR \qr

HIGH COIURT \ DATED:1.311112025 s THE \ :I 1 B HAR l[2f I * *

ORDER

WP.No.40026 of 2014 DISMISSIhIG THE W.P AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

,E W (>