Dandu Navneeth, Adopted v. The State Of Telangana,

[ 3303 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO WRlT PETITION NO: 32419 OF 2017 Between:

Dandu Navneeth, Adopted, S/o. Late D. Ramachandran, aged about 27 years, Occ: V.R.A. R/o. Pulukurthy Village, Damera Mandal, Warangal Rural District' Telangana state'

...pETlroNER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Warangal Rural, Warangal Rural District.

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Warangal Rural, Warangal Rural District.

4. The Tahsildar, Damera Mandal, Warangal Rural District. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue directions more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the salaries from February 2017 to till date is illegal, arbitrary, and discriminatory and the same is liable to be set aside and further direct the respondents to pay the salaries from February 2017 and continue the petitioner VRA in which the petitioner working. l.A. NO: 1OF 2017(W PMP.

NO: 40327 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as VRA, Pulukurthy Villageu*Damera Mandal, Warangal Rural District and continue to pay salaries since february, 2017, pending disposal of the main writ petition.

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.32419 of 2OL7 ORDER:

When the rnatter is taken up for hearing, Sri B.Kamalakara Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner fairly submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication 2.

Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

3.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, sha-ll stand closed SD/. C. PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSTSTATyIREGTSTRAR tlt) SECTION OFFICER To

1. One CC to SRI KAMALAKARA RAO BATHINA, Advocate IOPUCI

2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies PSK.

GJP ?'\o,- //TRUE COPYII

HIGH COURT DATED:2910812023 $9 STATE

ORDER

WP.No.32419 of 2017 15 stI10 C) j'

,+ o,J * DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

e-%\q\n-g