Palaboina Parashuram v. The State Of Telangana
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1886 of 2025 ORAL ORDER:
Seeking the Court to enlarge the petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.3, 4 and 6 in Crime No.1041 of 2024 of Chaitanyapuri Police Station, Rachakonda Commissionerate, on bail, the present Criminal Petition is filed.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that although the criminal petition is filed by accused Nos.3, 4 and 6, Mr. Boddu Mahesh, who is arrayed as accused No.1 in the subject crime is mistakenly added as petitioner No.2, and therefore, his name be deleted in the cause title. 3.
The brief facts of the case are that on 20.12.2024, at 8 pm, a complaint was filed by Sri Pagilla Purushotham, alleging a pre-planned attack by Boddu Mahesh and six others with a chopper outside Amaravathi Wines shop at Nagole Road. The complainant claimed that Mahesh, who had a previous dispute with him, had agreed to compromise on a case filed
against them but instead attacked him and his friends, causing injuries to Pasham Nagaraju and Gadamoni Ramu. 4.
Heard Sri P. Manoj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as well as Sri Syed Yasar Mamoon, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent stating that the complainant and accused have no relation, and the present case is a false filing due to an unresolved old case. The Police allegedly implicated the petitioners without proper investigation. He further submitted that the petitioners are law-abiding citizens with a good reputation, no criminal antecedents, and have been falsely accused and that the petitioners are a permanent resident with fixed assets, willing to provide sureties and abide by Court conditions. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioners by allowing this criminal petition. 6.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners stating that the allegations leveled against the petitioner are serious in nature. Therefore, at this stage,
granting of bail to the petitioners does not arise. Hence, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition. 7.
In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and a perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the petitioners are in jail from 25.12.2024. As the material part of the investigation is completed and 20 witnesses were examined and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it fit to grant bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions:
i.
The petitioners shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned IV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate-cum-IV Additioanl Junior Civil Judge, Cyberabad, Rangareddy Distict at L.B. Nagar.
ii.
The petitioners shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) weeks, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.
iii.
The petitioners shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.
8.
Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 18.02.2025 SAI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1886 of 2025 Date: 18.02.2025 SAI