The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S. M.A.Basith Khan And Others

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD I.T.T.A. M.P. No.42 of 2016 in/and I.T.T.A.No.356 of 2016 Judgment:

ITTA MP No.42 of 2016:

It is stated by the learned Standing Counsel for the Department that the conditional order dated 30-6-2016 has been complied with, by sending the amount by post. The learned Standing Counsel has produced proof. We accept the same. Therefore, the application is allowed. Delay condoned.

ITTA No.356 of 2016:

2. Office to number. The monetary effect of this appeal is admittedly within the ceiling limit prescribed by Circular No.21/2015, dated 10-12-2015. The case is not covered by any one of the exceptions in para 8 of the Circular. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. No costs. ___________________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.

___________________________ G.SHYAM PRASAD, J.

27th August, 2016.

Ak HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD

I.T.T.A. M.P. No.42 of 2016 in/and I.T.T.A.No.356 of 2016 27th August, 2016.

(Ak)