Sarikonda Ramakrishnam Raju, v. The Commissioner,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI WRI T PETI TI ON No.9934 of 2013 ORDER:

The learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and that, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.

2.

Sri N.Praveen Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent Municipality is present.

3.

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed.

__________________ M.Seetharama Murti, J 19th April, 2017 Bvv