Panthangi Ashok v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Crl.M.P.No.376 of 2015 in Crl.P.No.372 of 2015 and Crl.P.No.372 of 2015 Common Order:

The de-facto complainant and his counsel Sri S.Janardhan Goud are present. Accused and their counsel Sri P.Ammi Reddy are present. Heard both sides.

On the complaint lodged by de-facto complainant the police of Nalgonda I Town PS registered a case against the accused for the offences under Sections 365, 322, 506 r/w 34 IPC and investigation is stated to be pending. Now, the submission of both parties is that all of them are friends and some of them are students and they have amicably settled their financial disputes and they are living peacefully and hence permission may be accorded to them to settle the matter and consequently the proceedings in Cr.No.293 of 2014 of Nalgonda I Town PS may be quashed in the interest of justice.

Having regard to the above said submission and considering the fact that parties are friends and some of them are students and that they have amicably settled their financial disputes and they are living peacefully and no purpose will be served even if the parties are driven to trial, and following the decision reported in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another[1] this petition is allowed

and permission is accorded to compromise the mater and compromise is recorded and consequently the proceedings in C.C.No.293 of 2014 on the file of Nalgonda I Town PS are hereby quashed.

In the result, both the petitions are accordingly allowed.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J 05-02-2015 Murthy [1] (2012) 10 SCC 303