Dr. M. Nagabhushanam, Hyd And 2 Othrs v. The Govt. Of A.P., Revenue Dept., Hyd And 7 Othrs

13377 | HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) IVONDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE THE GHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.10038 OF 2010 Between:

1. Dr. IV. Nagabhushanam, S/o. IV. Ramakrishnaiah, Aged 68 years, Retired as Professor R/o. Plot No. 211, B-Block, Paragoan Venkatadri Apartments, Barkathpura, Hyderabad Past State PResident of A.P. Govt. Doctors, Association, Putlibowli, Hyderabad.

2..Dr. 1,t1. Venkateshwar Rao, S/o.lvl. Laxminarsimha Rao, Aged 66 years, Retired Professor and Ex. Treasurer of Govt. Civil Asst. Surgeons Association R/o. Plot No. 82 Abhyudaya Nagar, Chintalkunta, Hyderabad - 74

3. Dr. T.V. Krishna Rao, S/o.T.Appa Rao,' Aged 75 years, Retired Superintendent of Govt. ENT Hospital R/o. H.no. 5-9-3Ol1l27lAB Basheerabagh Palace, Hyderabad ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad 2- The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad

3. The District Collector, Hyderabad District, Hyderabad

4. The Superintendent, Government E.N.T. Hospital Koti, Hyderabad

5. Andhra Pradesh Government Doctor's Association, Putlibowli, Hyderabad Rep. by its President

6. A.Venkatesh, S/o. A-Balaram R/o. H.no. 5-1-513/2 to 6, Putlibowli, Hyderabad

7. A.Ramesh, S/o. A.Balaram Rl/o. H.no. 5-1-51312 to 6, Putlibowli, Hyderabad 8, A.Krishna, S/o. A.Balaram Rl/o. H.no. 5-1-51312 to 6, Putlibowli, Hyderabad

9. M. Srinivas, S/o. Linga Reddy, 42 years, R/o. B-12' Flal -1 , Baghlingampally, Hyderabad - 44

Respondent No.9 is impleaded as W.P l\rl.P.No.32237 of 2010 per Court Order dated 07 -03-2011 in ...RESPONDENTS t Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus ('1 ) declaring the impugned G.O.Ms. Nos. 627, 628 and 629 dated 24.6.2OO9 as illegal, without jurisdiction and set aside the same in public interest (PlL) and (2) to direct the 1st respondent to investigate and find any malafide intention and deliberate neglect of the duty to protect the government property on the part of the officials involved in decision making process to transfer the rights by means of impugned G.O.Ms.No- 627 to 629 daled 24.6.2009 in favour of Respondents 6 to 8 and take appropriate action against erring officials in accordance with law.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 12893 OF 2o10) Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an injunction against the respondents 6 to 8 not to enter or interfere with the possession and enjoyment of land in respect of 3,831 sq. yards covered under the impugned G.O.tr4s.Nos. 627 to 629 dated 24.6.2009.

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 15434 OF 2O1Ol Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioners to file this additional Affidavit to be treated as part and parcel of writ petition No.1 0038/201 0.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A. SURESH FOR SRl. S LAKSHMA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: SRI D. SRIKANTH, AGP FOR ADVOCATE GENERAL Counsel for the Respondent No.s: SRI K. KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.9: SRI SURESH KUMAR POTTURI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 to 8: SRI S. SRINIVAS REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER

ThL HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.l0038 of 2010 ORDER: (per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe) Mr. A. Suresh, learned counsel appears for Mr. S. Lakshma Reddy, learned counsel appears for the petltroners.

Mr. D. Srikanth, Iearned Assistant Government Pleader attached to the Office of learned Advocate General appears for respondent Nos.l to 4.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that on account of efflux of time, the issue involved in the Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous.

3. [n view of aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending,, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRI S. LAKSHMA REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

2. :|wo CCs to the Advocate General, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

3. One CC to SRI K. KRISHNA REDDY, Advocate IOPUC]

4. One CC to SRI SURESH KUMAR POTTURI, Advocate [OPUC]

5. One CC to SRI S. SRINIVAS REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

6. Two CD Copies P %+

HIGH COURT DATED:2610212024 1t\E STAI€'

( + tz c"

I- ? 2 rr[R 2024 .r I r ct\ '-a-"

o€sr,,.

ORDER

WP.No.10038 of 2010 I l I I DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS \Azq \t