Masood Ahmed v. The State Oftelangana, And 2 Others

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY W .P.NO.4 4 5 0 OF 2 0 2 0

O R D E R

The grievance of the petitioner is that though notices were issued for conducting of survey in pursuance of his application dated 29.10.2019, the respondents are not taking further action for completing survey and demarcation.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

In W.P.No.4811/ 2011 and batch dated 28.4.2016, this court considering the grievance of the petitioners therein, in not conducting survey and demarcation, disposed of the writ petitions with the following direction: "In view of the above facts and circumstances, the writ petitions are disposed of directing the respondent - authorities to consider the applications of the petitioners for survey and demarcation of lands after receiving necessary charges, keeping in view the Circulars vide Rc.No.N1/ 1408/ 07, dated 13.07.2007, Rc.No.N1/ 6543/ 99 dated 25.07.2001 and Circular vide Rc.No.N2/ 1741/ 2010, dated 18.05.2010 and also in terms of the judgment in W.A.No.618 of 2013 and also keeping in view the provisions of Sections 89, 89-A and 92 of the Act and take necessary action and communicate the decision to the parties. It is open for the petitioners to prefer appeal against the said order, if they are aggrieved in terms of circulars referred to above."

Since notices are stated to have been issued, the 3rd respondent is directed to take further action in accordance with the above directions of this court in W.P.No.4811 of 2011 and batch dated 28.04.2016. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

Interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

------------------------------------ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J DATE: 06-03-2020 AVS