Datla Shiva Rama Raju v. The State Of Telangana

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1270 of 2019 ORDER :

Respondent No.2, who is accused No. 2, was granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 04.01.2019 by the XV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally. The present petition is filed seeking cancellation of the said bail.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner/ de facto complainant that the lower Court has granted anticipatory bail to respondent No.2/ A2 taking into consideration that she is aged about 56 years and that she is a lady residing separately. He further contended that the address of respondent No.2 has been mentioned as she is staying in Krishna District but most of the time she used to stay in the house of A1 and because of her harassment, the deceased committed suicide. It is further submitted that by way of investigation it was established that there was constant harassment by A2. However, it was not taken into consideration at the time of granting anticipatory bail to her. Thus, it is prayed to cancel anticipatory bail granted to A2, vide order dated 04.01.2019.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and learned public prosecutor and perused the records. It is contended by the learned counsel for respondent No.2 that subsequent to granting of anticipatory bail, respondent No.2/ accused No.2 has been complying with the conditions imposed on her while granting anticipatory bail and she has all along been cooperating with the

investigation of the matter. It is further contended that respondent No.2 has never misused the liberty granted to her. Except the averments that the deceased was subjected to harassment by her husband and mother-in-law subsequent to her marriage and so she committed suicide and that the trial Court without looking into factual aspects granted anticipatory bail to respondent No.2, there is no other ground in the application that respondent No.2 has ever misused the liberty granted to her.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and as no specific ground has been made out for cancellation of bail granted to A2, this Court cannot consider the request of the petitioner. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. __________________ JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI 03.06.2019 vhb