Smt. Adiba Tarnnum v. The Union Of India, Represented By Its Principal Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * WRIT PETITION No. 27173 of 2015 BETWEEN Adiba Tarnnum ... PETITIONERS AND The Union of India, rep. by its Principal Secretary and others ...RESPONDENTS Date of Order pronounced: 26.08.2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgments?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether his Lordship wish to see the Yes/No fair copy of the Judgment?

ORDER:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr.Josyula Bhaskara Rao, learned standing counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2; and learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.3 and 4.

2. Writ petition is not only frivolous but is made without any basis and any investigation under the Extradition Act, 1962. The seventh respondent is neither a proclaimed offender nor a convict nor there is any allegation that any international treaty exists between India and the country in which the seventh respondent is residing. On the filing of complaint by petitioner against the seventh respondent, an offence is just recently registered in Cr.No.76 of 2015 on 03.08.2015 by the fourth respondent. The relief sought for is in the nature of seeking extradition of the seventh respondent. In the absence of any of the ingredients, no such directions can be given as sought for by the petitioner.

Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J August 26, 2015 LMV