Korsa Bala Krishna v. Sri Ravi Gupta, And 2 Others
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P NAVEEN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 346 OF 2021 Contempt Case filed Under Sections '10 to 1 2 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the 3 rd respondent herein for their willfully disobedience the Order of the High Coud dated. 06.01 .2021 in W.P.No.05 of 2021 . Between:
Korsa Bala Krishna, S/o. Buchaiah, Aged about 47 yearc, Cast by Koya' Occ.Cultivation, Fi./o. Maddulagudem Village, Pinapaka Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District.
...Petitioner
AND Sri. Ravi Gupta, S/o. Not Known, Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
2. Sri. Sunil Dutt lPS., S/o. Not Known, Superintendent of Police, Bhadradri Kothagudem at Kothagudem.
3. TVR Suri, S/o. Not Know, Station House Officer, E. Bayyaram Police Station' Pinapaka lVlandal.
...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C. RAMACHANDRA RAJU Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR HOME (TG) The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO co NO,346 0F 202L ORDER:
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.S of 2021 dated 06.01.2027 are complied with.
Recording the same, Contempt Case is closed. Pending miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand closed. SD/. CH. MALLIIGRJUNA VARMA DEl'UTY REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// SiECTION OFFICER To, 1.
Sri. Ravi Gupta, Principal Secretary, Home Department, S tate of Telangana, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
Sri. Sunil Dutt lPS, Superintendent of Police, Bhadrac ri Kothagudem at Kothagudem.
TVR Suri, Station House Officer, E. Bayyaram Police Station, Pinapaka Mandal, One CC to Sri. C. Ramachandra Raju, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Home (TG), High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] Two CD Copies One Spare Copy 2.
TPr 4.
5.
6.
7.
MMK
HIGH COURT DATED: 31tOBt2O21
ORDER
1 i-rE o i;, CC.No.346 of 2021 3 ru sEP2ozt * :
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE I