R.Santhosh Babu, v. The District Collector,

[ 32ss ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRl JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 23211 OF 2013 Between:

R.Santhosh Babu, S/o. Ramulu, Hindu, aged about 29 years, Weaver, F/o. Vemulawada, Karimnagar District.

...PETITIONER AND 't . The District Collector, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

2. The State Election Commission, Rep by its Commissioner, State Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

3. The Municipal Commissioner/Election Offrcer, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

4. The revenue Divisional Officer, Vemulawada, Karimnagar District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of mandamus declaring the Gazette Extraordinary issued by the respondents fixing reservations for the Nagara Panchyath of Vemulawada is null and void and that the same is contrary to the Provisions of A.P. Municipalities act read with A.P. Municipalities (reservation of seats in Municipal Councils and Nagara Panchayath Rules 1995) and consequently to set aside the Gazette Extraordinary issued by the respondents l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013{WPMP. NO: 28510 0F 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents No 1 and No 2 to conduct an enquiry and initiate action for

---f/ / rectifying the irregularities committed in the fixation of reservations pursuant my representation dated 27-7-2013, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K. MALLESHWAR! Counsel for the Respondent No.1 &4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRt. V.V.PRABHAKARA RAO, SC FOR STATE ELECTION COMMISION Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: SRl. R.A.CHARI The Court made the following: ORDER

TIIE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR lVrit Petition No.232L1 of2Ol3 ,/ ORDER:

On an earlier occasion i.e., on 2g.O2.2023, as there t I was no representation for the petitioner(s) the matter was I directed to be listed today under the caption for dismissal. l :

i j

2. Accordingly, today, though the matter has been j , listed under the caption for dismissal and when the matter Jl t I has 6een taken up for hearing in the afternoon session, I i I there is no representation for the petitioner(s). Hence, I this Court has no other option except to dismiss the matter for non - prosecution.

3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

SDTV.KAVITHA ASSTSTANI.REGISTRAR //TRUE coPY// <1D \ SECTION OFFICER \ To, Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE ,High Court for the State of Telangana,at Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to SRl. K. MALLESHWARI, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRl. V.V. PRABHAKAR RAO, SC FOR STATE ELECTION coMMrssroN [oPUC] One CC to SRl. R.A.CHARI [OPUC] Two CD Copies 2.| BM GJP

HIGH COURT DATED:31 10712023 trY 5i* J$ tt:!', ic, OE sEF () I t DES paTc

ORDER

oi WP.No.23211 ot 2013 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WTHOUT COSTS )nry