A.Kranti Kumar v. The State Of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp And Another

\

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5867 OF 2016 Between:

Arram Kranti Kumar, S/o. Ashok Kumar AND ,..PETITIONEFUACCUSED

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

2. Y.Sravanthi, W/o. A.Kranti Kumar ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 oI Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the impugned order dated 28-03-2016 in Crl.M.P.No. 948 of 2016 in Crime No. 33 of 2016 of WPS, CCS, DD, Hyderabad on the file of the Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Criminal Courts, Nampally, Hyderabad against the Petitioners.

CRLPMP. NO: 6840 OF 2016 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the orders dated 28-03-2016 in Crl.M.P.No. 948 of 2016 in Crime No.33 of 2016 of WPS, CCS, DD, Hyderabad on the file of the Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Criminal Courts, Nampally, Hyderabad including personal appearance of the Petitioner. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of STi.N.V.ANANTHA KRISHNA, Advocate (being not present) for the Petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri K.Venkat Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5867 of2016 ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is ftled challenging the orders dated 2a.O3.2O16 in Crl.M.P.No.948 of 2016 in Crime No.33 of 2016 of Women Police Station, CCS, DD, Hyderabad, on the file of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Narnpa-Ily, Hyderabad, wherein the petition to conduct potency test to the respondent No. 1 therein was allowed.

2.

No representation on behalf of the petitioner, even after posting this matter today under the caption "for dismissal" in the cause list, the very fact that the petitioner has not been attending this Court to prosecute his case shows that the purpose for which this petition is filed may not survive and thereby this matter might have become infructuous.

4, In view of the above facts and circumstances, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

As a sequel, pending miscelianeous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

srl/-P PADMANABHA REDDY -- nsstsrnuT RFGISTRAR ('1"-'- //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To

1. The Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate' Nampally' Criminal Courts' ze, T[:""t"'a'$i1""'8",3,['E?:.Y.",i1"?:,?i8'r"sf,]f i".?in"""3,,',"%'?"fl1o'?'1 Hvderabad (OUT) 4'oit;"bd 6 dri tl.V.Rn"ntn' Krishna' Advocate. (oPUC) ;. 5.# 6d I s;i t(.vent at Reddv, Advocate (oPUC) Two CD CoPies One Spare CoPY 6.

7.

Kj.

-...4_*-^

t HIGH COURT DATED:13/06/2022 7 r-- q

ORDER

t, ct) CRLP.No.5867 of 2016 2 3 JUr 2022 ,:/ DISMISSING THE CRL.P.

/