K. Dhanunjai, v. The Commissioner Of Prohibition And Excise,

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOO KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO:23710 OF 2013 Between:

K. Dhanunjaya,, S/o K.Krishnaiah, aged about 40 years, Owner of the vehicle TATA ACE HT BS-ll bearing No. AP 22 X 7003, Rl/o H.No.1-42, Regadichilakamarri Village, Kondurg Mandal, IVlahaboobnagar District. ...PETITIONER AND

1. The Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.

2. The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise,, Mahaboobnagar Division, [Vlahaboobnagar District

3. The S.H.O.Prohibition & Excise Station, Narayanapet, Mahabobbnagar District.

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, lMahaboobnagar Division the 2nd respondent herein passed in Cr.No.B1/91/2011 dated 24-03-2012 as confirmed by the respondent in his order dated 21-02-2013 in Cr. No.1 107/2013' CPE/D4 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice and void, being in violation the mandatory provisions of Sec.34(a) of the A.P. Excise Act 1968,and consequently set-aside the same. WPMP.

NO: 29149 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitjon, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order of the Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, Mahaboobnagar Division the 2nd respondent herein passed in Cr.No.B1191/2011 dated 24-03-2012 pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI I.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T'VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITI ON No.23710 of 20 13 ORDER:

Leamed counsel for petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ petition does not survive for any more consideration by this court and it has become infructuous.

Recording the same, this Writ Petition is closed' No costs' As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand c Iosed.

SD/. M.SANTHI VARDHANI JOINT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// (4dJ.,",* SECTIO To, l. 9ne CC to SRI l.cOPAL REDDY, Advocate tOpUCl

2. rwo ccs to the Gp for prohibition & Excise, Aignbdurt for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

3. Two C.D. Copies.

4. One Spare Copy.

MRC SB oQ.F

;

HIGH COURT DNIED:0610412022 I I c / (\ 7) a)o .d ii .t r/ * [5 JUt ?022

ORDER

* WP.No.23710 of 2013 OESpnrC CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS qyr*