High Court for State of TelanganaWP/440/2015disposed of no costs

Ismath Zamani v. The State Of Telangana,

2015-01-30Vilas V.Afzulpurkar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.440 of 2015 BETWEEN Ismath Zamani.

... PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.

...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. SRINATH ATMAKUR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (TG) The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Petitioner's grievance is against the third respondent,

in particular, that the petitioner is being called to the police station and is made to sit throughout the day, though no case or complaint is registered against her and that the police is interfering and pressuring her to settle the civil disputes between the petitioner and one M. Sudhakar and M. Suresh. The said two persons, who are named in the affidavit, are not made parties to the writ petition.

2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, received instructions, from the third respondent, which state that, as on today, no complaint or case is registered against the petitioner and that she had never approached the police station nor gave any complaint but she stated that she has made a representation to the Commissioner, Cyberabad through post, but no such complaint was received by them.

It is also stated that the petitioner was never summoned nor called to the police station and was never asked to vacate the said land or pressurized otherwise to settle the civil dispute between the petitioner and the said persons.

3. Since, as on today, no case or complaint is registered, there cannot be any interference by the third respondent with the civil rights of the petitioner and since the instructions noted above on behalf of the third respondent also confirm the same, the said instructions are recorded. The writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _____________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J January 30, 2015 DSK