The District Collector v. Challa Anji Reddy

n\ [ 33r1 I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI !

i I I WRIT APPEAL NO: 211 OF 2023 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent honorable court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 111112023 made in WP No, 3987012022. I t Between:

1 . The District Collector, Nalgonda District at Nalgonda, Telangana State.

2. f he Executive Engineer Panchayat Raj Miryakaguda Division At Mirayalaguda Nalgonda.

I AND ...APPELLANTS L Challa Anji Reddy. S/o Somireddy, Aged 49 years, Occ. Agriculture/ Sarpanch, R/o Veerlapalem Village, Dameracherla Mandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana State

2. The Telangana State Power Generation Corp Ltd TSGENCO, Vidyut Soudha Khairtabad Hyderabad Rep By lts CMD

3. The Chief Engineer (Civil Thermal) TSGENCO Vidyuth Soudha Hyderabad,

4. The Chief Engineer / Constructions/YTPS Veerlapalem Village Dameracherla Mandal Nalgonda District, Telangana State.

I i ,..RESPONDENTS lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 111112023 in W.P.No.3987012022, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal.

ll Counsel for the Appellants: SRI B.S. PRASAD, ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : CH. SAMSON BABU Counsel for the Respondent No.2 to 7: SRI R. PAVAN REDDY, SC FOR TSGENCO The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

) THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HON'BIiE SELlqSalerE rt-IUKABA'!4q WRIT APPEAL No.211 of 2o23 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhugan) Mr. B.S.Prasad, learned Advocate General has informed the Court that necessary steps u,ould be taken to instruct learned Government Pleaders to appraise the Courts when writ petitions are filed against State Ofltcers \ but without impleading the State, similarly when appeals are filed by Officers without the State being one of the appellants.

2.

However, insofar this appeal is concerned, learned Advocate General submits that appellants have already filed a review petition before the learned Single Judge for review of order dated 1 l.Ol.2O23 passed ln W.P.No.3987O of 2022.

HC] & NTRJ W.A.No.21 1 of 2023 3.

That being the position and recording the submissions made by the learned Advocate General, we close the present writ appeal.

4.

Writ Appeal is accordingly closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

5. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Appeal, shall stand closed. SD/.I.NAGA;KSHMI DEPUW REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTIO OFFICER To,

1. Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT. Hioh Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUf]

2. One CC to SRI CH SAMSON BABU, Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRI R. PAVAN REDDY, SC FOR TSGENCO IOPUC]

4. Two CD Copies BN sw ,, J (t

HIGH COURT DATED:1710312023 14E ST/ris:

Cz,.

r'\'

1._

JUDGMENT

a:

o {.) 12 ilN z[?x WA.No.211 ot 2023 CLOSING THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS 9u) rl d4