J.Srilaxmi , Anuadha Katike v. State Of Telangana

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.1530 of 2020 ORDER:

The petitioner-A2 filed the present petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking to grant anticipatory bail to her in Crime No.128 of 2019 on the file of Kulsumpura Police Station, Hyderabad District, registered for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 506, 509 IPC and under Section 5 of T.S.Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments Act.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/A2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the record. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner/A2 submits that charge sheet is filed in the crime and he prays to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

4. The material on record would show that earlier application for anticipatory bail filed by petitioner-A2 was dismissed on merits by this Court vide order dated 28.10.2019 in Crl.P.No.6601 of 2019 directing her to surrender before the competent Court and file an application for regular bail. However, she filed Crl.P.440 of 2020 for anticipatory bail and the same was also dismissed on the ground that there are no changed circumstances. At present, filing of charge sheet is not a ground for consideration of anticipatory bail to petitioner/A2 and there are no changed circumstances from the date of dismissal of earlier bail petition. Hence, I find that this is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to petitioner/A2. However, the

petitioner/A2 is directed to surrender before the trial Court and file an application for regular bail, and on filing such application, the trial Court shall consider the same in accordance with law after giving due notice to the Public Prosecutor.

5.

With the aforesaid directions, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

6.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any pending in this criminal petition, shall stand dismissed.

_____________ G. SRI DEVI, J 10th March, 2020 sj