Arrolla Narsamma , Narsu Bai v. Velma Venkatram Reddy, And 2 Others

i

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD '

THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 369 OF 2021 Petition under Arlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, to set aside the Orders Dated 15lO2l2O2'1 in O.S.No.12 oI 2017 on the file of the Honorable Court of Principal District Judge, Adilabad.

Between:

Arrolla Narsamma @ Narsu Bai, Wo. A. Santhosh Reddy, Aged 57 years, Housewife, Rl/o. H.No.9-116/4, Reddy Colony, Gandhi Chowk, Boath, Adilabad Diskict

...Petitioner/Plaintiff

AND

1. Velma Venkatram Reddy, S/o. Late Shri V. Gangaiah, Aged 45 years, Agriculture. R/o. H.No.90147, Reddy Colony, Gandhi Chowk, Boath, Adilabad District.

2. Velma Chandra Mohan Reddy, S/o. Late Shri V. Gangaiah, Aged 43 years, Agriculture. Rl/o. H.No.90147, Reddy Colony, Gandhi Chowk, Boath, Adilabad District.

3. Velma Surya Prakash Reddy, S/o. Late Shri V. Gangaiah, Aged 36 years, Agriculture.

(All are Ryo. H.No.90147, Reddy Colony, Gandhi Chowk, Boath' Adilabad District.) Respondents/Defendants.

lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further Proceedings in 0.S.No.'12 of 2017 on the file of the Honorable Principal District Judge, Adilabad, pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : Sfl(iA NAGENDRA RAO, Advocate Counsel for the Respondents iRUDRESH DESHPANDE, Advocate The Cou( made the following ORDER:

ffi .'a.

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CTVIL REVISION PETITION No.369 Ot 2O2l ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the revision petitioner/plaintiff aggrieved by the order, dated 15.02.202 I passed in O.S.No.t2 of 2OlZ bv the learned Principal District Judge, Adilabad.

2.

None appeared on beha_lf of the revision petitioner. There was no representation even on 23.11.2023 and 07.12.2023. Though the matter is listed on this day under the caption 'For Dismissal", yet there is no representation. 3.

Hence, the Civil Revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/.K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Principal District Judge, Adilabad.

2. One CC to SRl. A NAGENDRA RAO Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRl. RUDRESH DESHPANDE Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD copies.

cvk,"s

I I HIGH COURT DATED:1411212023 iu C, JY * ^\F &"

.I(t i,, Lrj .aA .1, FtaJ ld.o o l,) rt 3:

ORDER

aj -) !,.i\ i\ CRP.No.369 of 2021 CRP IS DISMISSED FOR NON.PROSECUTION.

@r1.$ \3