Y. Anitha, v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO W.P.No.20515 of 2014 O R D E R:

The petitioner sought for a writ of mandamus for declaring the action of Respondents 2 to 6 in seeking to appoint the 7th respondent for the post of Anganwadi Helper of Hanakanekal-II Village, Kanekal Mandal, Anantapur District, contrary to the Notification and the guidelines furnished by the State Government in their G.O.Ms.No.21, Women Development, Child Welfare & Disabled Welfare (ICDS) Department, dated 24-08-2007, as illegal.

The long and short of the case set up by the writ petitioner is that the 7th respondent has produced two different memoranda of marks obtained from the Zilla Parishad High School, Venkatadri Village, Beluguppa Mandal; one disclosing that she has secured a total of 328 marks in the VII Class, while the other discloses that she has secured only 272 marks. Since the 7th respondent has made different claims, the petitioner challenged her selection. It is not in doubt that the writ petitioner has produced a certificate reflecting as if she has secured only 181 marks in the VII class out of 500 marks and consequently, she has secured far less marks than the marks secured by the 7th respondent. Further, the 5th respondent and the 7th respondent both have denied and disputed the 7th respondent producing two different marks memoranda.

marks are more than the marks secured by the writ petitioner. Hence, the selection of the 7th respondent cannot be called in question by the writ petitioner.

Therefore, this writ petition stands dismissed at the admission stage, but however, without costs.

Consequently, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand dismissed.

__________________________ NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO, J.

mrk 20.03.2015.