High Court for State of TelanganaWP/26806/2017dismissed

Muslim Educational Social v. The Convener,

2017-09-053 pages

* I N THE HI GH COURT OF JUDI CATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND + WRI T PETI TI ON No.26806 of 2017 % Date: 05-09-2017 # Betw een:

1. Muslim Educational Social & Cultural Organisation (MESCO) H.No.22-11037/1, Darul Shifa, Hyderabad-500 024, Telangana State, India, rep. by its Secretary, Dr. Fakhruddin Mohammed.

2. Mesco College of Pharmacy, H.No.13-5-741, Mustaidpura, Karwan Road, Hyderabad-500 006, Telangana State, India, rep. by its Chairman, Dr. Fakhruddin Mohammed.

3. Dr. Fakhruddin Mohammed, S/o. Dr. Samsamuddin Mohammed, R/o. Street No.3, Tarnaka, Hyderabad. (T.S.) ... Petitioners And

1. The Convener, Telangana State EAMCET Admissions - 2017, Sankethika Bhavan, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.

2. Pharmacy Council of India (PCI), rep. by its Secretary, Combined Councils Building, Kotla Road, Aiwan-e-Ghalib Marg, New Delhi - 110 002.

3. Telangana State Council for Higher Education, rep. by its Secretary, Masab Tank Campus, Mahaveer Marg, Opp: Mahaveer Hospital, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.

4. All India Council for Technical Education Indira Gandhi Sport Complex, I.P. Estate, New Delhi rep. by its Secretary.

5. Osmania University (OU), Hyderabad, rep. by its Registrar,

6. The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. ... Respondents ! Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Omar A. Pasha ^ Counsel for Respondents 1 & 3 : Mr. A. Ramakanth Reddy ^ Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 4 : Mr. K. Lakshman (ASG) ^ Counsel for respondent No.5 : Mr. Ch. Jagannadha Rao ^ Counsel for respondent No.6 : G.P. for Higher Education < GI ST:

> HEAD NOTE:

? Cases referred

VRS,J & TR,J W.P.No.26806/2017 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN And WRI T PETI TI ON No.26806 of 2017 ORDER: (Per VRS,J) It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the writ petition has become infructuous. Hence the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

2. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending in this writ petition, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. _______________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN, J.

____________ T. RAJANI , J.

5th September, 2017.

VRS,J & TR,J W.P.No.26806/2017 HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE V.RAMASUBRAMANI AN AND W.P.No.26806 of 2017 (Per VRS,J) 5th September, 2017 Js.