The State Of Telangana v. Mary Evangilen
C) l [ 3251 I i I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD I WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT i THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE K. SURENDER CRIMIN AL PETITION NO: 1384 OF 201 9 Between:
The State of Telangana, through Station House Officer, Musheerabad P.S., Hyderabad, Rep., by ihe Public Pfosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana ...PETITIONER/COMPLAINANT\ AND Mary Evangilen, Wo. Alfred, Age 49 Years, Rl/o. H.No. 11-13, MCH, East Parsigutta, Musheerabad, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT/ACCUSED Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Order passed by the I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad vide Crl.M.P. No. 1818 ot2018 in SC PCS No.'19 of 2017, Dt. 1311212018.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Public Prosecutor for the Petitioner and of Sri. T. Chandra Shekar, Advocate for the Respondent.
The Court made the following: ORDER
\!
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1384 oF 2019 ORDER:
1.
I-earned coutrsel for tl-re petitioner/cornplainant submits that the cause in the criminal petition no longer survives for adjudication and has become infructuous'
Recording the said submission' this Climilral Petition is dismissed as infructuous'
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending' shall stand closed' SD/-K. SAI KUMARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ ,,TRUE COPYI/ SECTION OFFICER to'.r. ,n" I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge' Hyderabad
2. The Station House oiiiSi'i"i"n""'"u"0 Pol'rc6 Station' Hvderabad'
3. Two ccs to PUBLli"ffiij#;iJioR Higrr court for the state of Telangana at Hvderabao. ,orlo*o* SHEKAR, Advocate topucl
4. OngCC to SRI' T Cl
5. Two CD CoPies \\.k'
USR/JAK
HIGH COURT DATED:2911112023 . . .. -1..i,',1 ,) ,i 't i ttB iij,i y o d * * L!
oE.spi$
ORDER
CRLP.No.1384 of 2019 DISMISSING THE CRL.P.
AS INFRUGTUOUS